Sunday, December 14, 2008

Blagojevich the Unworthy

There's been an awful lot of outraged huffing and puffing going on in the wake of the accusations against Governor Rod Blagojevich, the bad-haired boy of Illinois. Editorial writers across the country have had a field day denouncing Blago, as the tabs have tagged him. He's making deals! He's feathering his own nest! He's using bad language! And so's his wife!

Gosh Almighty. The editorialistas at USA Today even compared Blago's alleged offer to sell Barack Obama's Senate seat to Caligula's famous nomination of his horse Incitatus for the job of Roman consul.

But the comparison is unfair; Blago has none of Caligula's flair for the outrageous. Blago's name will be as distant from public memory as Sen. Larry "Wide Stance" Craig.

Despite the puniness of Blago's alleged abuses, the editorialistas have been calling for his head.

Excuse me if I fail to get exercised about reforming the sea of corruption that has suddenly hove into view thanks to only three months of government wiretaps in the governor's office. And forgive me if I fail to be shocked -- shocked! -- at the man's venality. The wiretaps reveal a tough-talking Chicago pol who, in the words of another such bird, appears to have merely been caught in the act of seeing his opportunities and taking them.

That other pol, the historically minded may remember, belongs to a long-gone (but not completely forgotten) former Democratic Senator from New York named George Washington Plunkitt, a proud and wealthy son of Tammany Hall. It was Plunkitt who made famous, in an interview with William Riordon in 1905, the distinction between "honest graft and dishonest graft."

"There's all the difference in the world between the two," Plunkitt said. He admitted -- with more than a touch of pride -- that he'd made a "big fortune" out of the game of New York politic is "and I'm gettin' richer every day." But his wasn't money made by dishonest graft, which would have been "blackmailin' gamblers, saloonkeepers, disorderly people, etc." No. It was none of that, said he:

"It was honest graft, and I'm an example of how it works. I might sum up the whole thing by sayin': 'I seen my opportunities and I took 'em."

Plunkitt then described to Riordon how, for example, knowing where a new bridge was scheduled to be built might be a valuable bit of information when the bids went out and the once-worthless land that he'd bought up for peanuts could be sold at a handsome profit when the time rolled around.

"Ain't it perfectly honest to charge a good price and make a profit on my investment and foresight?" he wanted to know.

And he didn't confine his investment opportunities to real estate speculation either. "Anything that pays is in my line." He then explained how he bought 250,000 granite blocks for $2.50 at auction. Imagine what he would have asked for if, like Blago, he'd had sole responsibility for the appointment of a seat in the U.S. Senate.

Am I endorsing political chicanery here? You bet I am, especially since I don't have an answer to this question: Who, besides Blago, was hurt by these revelations? The public? Not apparently. Whatever money he was hoping to make wasn't going to come from public coffers.

What's been hurt in all this is someone's IDEA of political propriety. A seat in the Senate shouldn't be up for sale. A price tag is so . . .unseemly.

Blago seen his opportunities and, in a political tradition that pre-dates Caligula, he took 'em.

If Blago had been more discrete, if he'd met directly with the job applicants in a room that was noisy enough to obliterate the possibility of being bugged, he would still be the funny-looking, highly self-regarding and wealthy Chicago politician with an unpronounceable name that he always was.

Now he's become the poster boy for what's wrong with the political system, and that's a shame, because he's such a drab example of the species he's come to represent.

What's discouraging about Blago isn't his greed or his unseemliness but his utter lack of style. A good big-city pol would by now have launched a loud pr counter-offensive, sent up a barrage of fireworks, blamed his chief of staff, blamed the media, the prosecutor, the winds off Lake Superior. A real Chicago pol would by now have generated enough good newspaper copy in defense of his actions to sell enough papers to pay off the Chicago Tribune's back debt.

Imagine for a minute what a pol like Plunkitt would have done in Blago's shoes. Or imagine what any of Plunkitt's true heirs would have done. Imagine The Kingfish, Huey Long of Louisiana or James Michael J. Curley, a chunk of whose fourth term as Mayor of Boston was spent in a federal peniteniary or, closer to home, imagine Albany's Mayor-for-Life, Erastus Corning. They were political operators of the first water, men who gave the people what they wanted by manipulating the levers of political machines they has mastered. Yes, they were greedy and corrupt by any moral standard you choose to use, and reformers of their day relished bashing them. But the names of the upstanding moralists Plunkitt called "goo-goos," good-government types, are lost to history while characters like Long, Curley and Corning are still remembered as friends of the people they may have fleeced but who also delivered whatever goods or services the people needed or wanted. The results are great and once-great cities, built by thieves whose peculiar strengths and weaknesses are the stuff of legend.

Blago, the inheritor of this colorful tradition, is unworthy of it. His alleged chicanery was all about him, not his constituents. Worse, he talked nakedly about his self-enrichment plans on a telephone he suspected was tapped. That's plain stupid, and whatever you want to say about the Plunkitts of the world, they weren't stupid.

Blago spilled the beans that any village trustee knows to keep tightly sealed and well hidden. He showed not that he was a corrupt politician but someone far more dangerous and dull -- an inept one, someone who couldn't play the game by rules that have been in effect since before Caligula's day, rules that have nothing to do with propriety and everything to do with making things happen, sometimes for the good of the public, sometimes for the good of the pol and sometimes for the good of all.

Sunday, December 7, 2008

Perhaps a Banana

Twenty years ago, I wrote "Perhaps a Banana," a column inspired by the nefarious antics of one Oliver North. He was a sort of male Sarah Palin, a right wing-nut who captured a lot more attention than he deserved back in the Reagan era. This column isn't strictly about him, he's the occasion rather than the subject of a story about the role of language in politics. It begins with the testimony of Robert W. Owen, a non-entity of the day, as quoted in The New York Times:


Q: And this signature - 'Warm regards, Steelhammer' - to whom did that refer?

A: That was one of Ollie North's code names

Q: Did f Contra leader] Adolfo Calero also have a code name?

A: Occasionally we called him Sparkplug.

Q: And did you haue a code name for yourself?

A: I would usually sign my memos 'T.C.'

Q: And what did T.C. stand for?

A. The Courier.

- Irangate testimony of Robert W. Owen, quoted in The New York Times

The buzzer summoning me into the Colonel's office buzzed. Actually, it rang, because it was a bell. Sometimes the Colonel finds it necessary to call one thing another. Actually he always finds it necessary to call one thing another. Today, the bell was a buzzer. Tomorrow, perhaps a banana. Only time and the Colonel's code book would tell. I entered the Colonel's basement redoubt.

He looked up at me. The medals on his chest jingled smartly, which was especially impressive since he was naked from the waist up. I noticed the Colonel had his service revolver trained on me. A look of firm resolve covered his face like a horse blanket. Through clenched teeth, he uttered a single command:

"Baascrwrd."

Seeing the puzzled look on my face, he relaxed his jaw muscles and repeated himself: "Password."

I was ready for him. "Waldorf salad."

He jumped from behind his desk, his automatic pointed in my face. I heard the safety flick off.

"Prepare to die, Marxist-Leninist tomato!"

My mind raced.

"Ooby Dooby!"

The Colonel's face relaxed.

"Ooby Dooby what?" he asked quietly.

"Ooby Dooby ... sir."

"That's better. At ease, T.C."

The Colonel shouldered his revolver and sat down behind his bullet-scarred desk. He turned to me.I could see there were tears in his eyes. He was obviously thinking about the freedom fighters. The gun fell off his shoulder.

"T.C.," he said, "this ol' poodle's going to Peoria in a microwave oven, you know that?"

My mind began to race again. "Poodle" was today's codeword for "the world." And Peoria was obviously hell. But what in Peoria was a microwave oven?

The Colonel must have seen the consternation on my face.

"Handbasket," he mumbled helpfully

At once I understood.

"Yes sir, the poodle certainly is going to Peoria. Yes, sir. That's a canary, for sure."

"T.C., I want you to take an important Buick over to the Popcorn, pronto."

"The Popcorn, sir? The Popcorn of the United States? The big enchilada himself ...?

"No, no, the enchilada's in Miami, pricing offshore command centers ..."

The phone rang in the middle of the Colonel's explanation He pointed to it.

"Get the banana, will you? I've gotta take a wicked maple tree."

He disappeared behind a door marked "Wombats." I got the banana on the third ring.

"Popcorn here. Give me Steelhead."

"Do you mean Colonel, uh, Steelhammer?

"Yeah. The Big Cheese ..."

"I'm sorry, sir, but there's no Mr. Cheese here. But if you'd like to leave a Buick for Col. `Steelhammer ..."

"Okay, okay. Tell him the eyes of the potato are upon him. Repeat. The eyes of the potato are upon him. Got that?"

"Got it.

"Good. Have a nice combat boot."

The line went dead. The Colonel returned, wiping his cabbages on his carburetor.

"Who was on the horn?"

"Sir?"

"The banana, stupid. Who called?"

"The Popcorn, sir."

"Any Buicks?"

“He said, ‘The eyes of the potato are upon you.’

The Colonel became livid.

"Is that a canary'? Well, you run right over there this minute and you tell his excellency I've had about enough of his Peoria-fired potato-eyes. Where's his sense of Hershey Bar? Whatever happened to good ol' American corn muffins? What's this great hockey stick of ours coming to, when a red-blooded American lampshade can't kick a little Marxist-Leninist candycorn without a bunch of Congressional teabags getting all steamed up? You tell Mr. Potato Head that the tuna fish has hit the overhead projector, and pretty soon, it's gonna be every wombat for himself."

"But sir, will the Popcorn understand what you're saying? I think he's missing a few pages from his code book."

The Colonel shook his head dismissively.

"He knows what I'm talking about. Him and me - we speak the same pineapple. Now get going. And shut the damned cottage cheese behind you."

Monday, November 24, 2008

Words - and why I voted for Obama

I wrote this column in The Times Herald Record shortly after Barack Obama's speech on racism during his campaign for the presidency:

We take words for granted. And even when we notice what they can and should be — conveyors of truth, the very stuff of hope and promise and beauty — we're only too happy to forget their importance in our workaday lives, and never more so than during a presidential campaign.
Talk is cheap, we say. Sticks and stones, we chant. You gotta walk it like you talk it. And so on.
In one of his most famous works, the poet Philip Larkin, who, like all poets, knew the importance of words, wrote that "Days are where we live."
With all due respect, if he'd grant me his poetic license for a moment, I'd amend that line to say that words are where we live, now more than ever before. And where we live these days is a none-too-pretty place.
The air we breathe is heavy with a smog of words — ill-considered, hateful, angry, resentful — that corrode the possibility of civil discourse, of understanding one another. I can't think of a better example of the Biblical Tower of Babel than what happens to the country during a presidential campaign.
So, when words are put to a different, conciliatory purpose — in the heat of a campaign, no less — when someone makes a different sound, it behooves a body to listen.
Which is what I did last Tuesday when Democratic presidential contender Barack Obama gave a speech he didn't have to give about a subject most of us would rather not look at in any serious way.
Ostensibly, Obama's speech was an effort to rescue his campaign from the incendiary verbal clutches of his outspoken — some would say racist — pastor, one Jeremiah Wright. The speech, which Obama wrote himself, could have been so much less than it was.
I won't detail the traps that lay in wait for him by undertaking this speech; soon enough, the ugly particulars that prompted it will be forgotten. But I'm convinced the speech itself won't suffer the same fate. Something different was said by a presidential candidate last week, and attention needs to be paid.
This was a speech that tried to use words to heal instead of harm, to explain instead of excuse, to praise and not to blame. Obama's words drew a portrait of a racially polarized America that anybody could recognize. His words were grounded in experience, not generalities. He talked about himself, but not in heroic terms. He spoke about the way people see things — often ugly things — when they sit around the kitchen table or down at the corner barber shop.
I have no idea if Obama's words will win a single vote, no idea if people will accept his explanation of his relationship to Wright, and I don't care. I'll leave that sort of evaluation to the people whose job it is to autopsy the words of politicians.
Such autopsies are easy, since so many of the words favored by politicians are the rootless creation of the strategy session, the focus group, the pollster's questionnaire.
But even the most skeptical post-speech analysts I saw or read appeared to be stunned at what they'd heard last week. They'd heard words that were alive, words that painted pictures of ideas that told a larger story than they'd expected to hear. Words that aimed to tell the truth, and frequently hit their target.
Does this mean Barack Obama should be our next president? Ask a political coroner. All I can tell you is how I felt that day, how the air felt fresh and clean and new again.

Craigslist want ad: Executive assistant to Evil Genius

This ad went out on Craigslist's "Platonic" helps wanteds. It also received some interesting replies, which I'll document soon. But first, the ad copy:

Intelligence not required – I’ll do the thinking, you’ll do the heavy lifting. Responsibilities include grunting in happy agreement as I loquaciously describe my plans to conquer the world. Must be ready to stand in awe of the fathomless depths of my intelligence. You’ll be called on to execute (in every sense of the word) my brilliantly conceived plans for world domination. I require only unquestioning loyalty, an encompassing knowledge of and talent for martial arts and a complete willingness to use those skills in the deadly pursuit of my fiendishly clever plots, world-domination-wise. Must be tolerant of my extravagant reliance on adverbs and run-on sentences. Knowledge of esoteric weaponry (derbies that kill, exploding waffle irons, poisonous canaries) a must. You’ll be expected to smile enigmatically while staring at my various adversaries as you prepare to kill them. Equal opportunity employer

Friday, November 14, 2008

Craigslist: Sidekick wanted

The following ad has been posted and, after a very interesting run, red-flagged. I'll be updating the story asap.

Wanted: Sidekick

Grizzled, single gentleman preferred. Must be able to fry eggs and boil coffee over an open fire while spluttering incomprehensibly. Age not an issue. Personal hygiene not an issue. Front teeth optional. Gun license required -- must be proficient at shooting the hats off suspicious strangers. Personal experience at calming a cattle herd on the verge of stampede a definite plus. Must be willing at all times to marvel at my physical dexterity, with little or no expectation of acknowledgment. gratitude or a decent salary. When not cooking, spluttering or conking suspected evildoers on the head with a skillet (provided) , must be prepared to laugh and my laconic, seemingly self-deprecatory remarks. Lifetime position for the right candidate. Horse and chuck wagon provided. Some mule-skinning may be required

Sunday, November 9, 2008

Coming Soon to a Real American Town Near You!

“Four Thousand BC!” – (Historical romance) The last surviving members of the Cha clan – beautiful cave woman Hot (Sarah Palin) and her studly mate Bet (Todd Palin) discover fire and all it can mean to a good filet of Tyranosaurus. But trouble arrives when they cross cudgels with the notorious Won clan, whose leader That stands for everything anti-Neanderthal. Also starring Mike, The Wonder Moose, as “Jake.” Rated PG, for too many big words.

“Schenectady, New York, New York” – (Fantasy) Joe the Songwriter (Sam Wurzelbacher) ankles The Big Apple and heads north to seek the All-American pleasures of life in a failing Rust Belt city. Depressed over his inability to find a word that rhymes with “Schenectady,” Joe buys the entire city and its surrounding suburbs on E-Bay. He and his theatrical troupe (“The Regular Joes”) then create an alternate universe in which plumbers and their friends rule the world.

“Splurge!” (Comedy) Perky Tina Fey, (hard-working Sarah Palin) pines for her Prince Charming and the polyester-free wardrobe she knows will attract him. So when her Fairy Godfather (Rudy Giuliani) offers her a $150,000 gift certificate at her favorite consignment store, she can’t resist. But first she must escape the clutches of the evil Cruella de Handler (Nicolle Wallace) who launches a whispering campaign claiming the princess is really a pumpkin. Co-starring the Republican National Committee.

“The Big Bailout of 2008” (Fantasy) Steve “Sergeant” Schmidt, Joe “The Plumber” Wurzelbacher and Karl “Turd Blossom” Rove star as members of the secret Anti-Socialist League, super heroes who team up to stem the no-longer-creeping Red Tide of socialism as it threatens to swamp the shores of capitalist America.. These three tough hombres don’t always see eye to eye, but don’t get on their fightin’ sides, not when there’s 700 billion dollars – and all those free toasters -- at stake! Also starring Chuck Norris in a dual role as Karl Marx and Henry Paulson.

“Sisterhood is Powerful” (Documentary) Down-to-earth Everywoman Sarah Palin, an ex- beauty- pageant-queen-turned-small-town-mayor-turned- Governor-of-Alaska-and-mother-of-five must do battle with a wicked warlock (Walter Monegan) hell-bent on bewitching her, her sister, her sister-in-law, her sister’s sister-in-laws and most of the rest of the hockey moms living above the 49th parallel. Also starring Vladimir Putin as Sarah’s nosy neighbor, Charlie.

“No Country Club for Old Men” (Political thriller) Based on a true story. A crusty, absent-minded sea captain (John McCain) sets out for the Bering Straits and a date with destiny. But his crew, unable to understand their dread captain’s obscene outbursts, turn at the last minute to his spunky first mate, (Sarah Palin) who energizes them all by calling down the ship’s terrible swift boats. But the enterprise runs aground in stormy November waters. All appears lost until the first mate (don’t call her Ishmael) hitches a ride on the back of a passing polar bear and returns home, where she is recognized by a band of elvish toymakers as Queen Aksala Palindrome, rightful sovereign of the newly independent continent of Alaska.

Sunday, August 3, 2008

But seriously, folks . . .

We're a father-son team whose mission is to deliver something to smile at or even laugh about to a humor-hungry world. We'll do this through posting essays (new and previously published) and art exhibits (stay tuned) as well as links to sites we like, re-prints of classic (and often forgotten) humor pieces, links to our favorite performers, writers, troupes and other surprises. We mean it to be a treasure trove of the new, the old and especially the unexpected.

As to who we are: I'm Jeremiah Horrigan, the father of the team. I go back 58 years, to the middle of the previous century. I've written for some big outfits (Sports Illustrated, New York Times) and more much more regularly for much humbler organizations (Woodstock (NY) Times, The Middletown Times-Herald Record). I'll soon be posting many rare and hard-to-find classic works. And I'll be posting minty-fresh pieces as the spirit -- and the times -- move me.

My son's name is Grady Kane-Horrigan. He's an artist whose wit and hilarious art works were the inspiration for this collaboration. He's currently most heavily engaged in being a father to three boys, so his personal introduction will have to wait until he gets a little time.

Stay tuned. And remember, Shoes for Industry! Malberg et Plano! And write when you get work.